spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
LGC Logo Local Government Commission
Home Page About Local Government Commission Join the LGC
Search Site Map Contact the LGC
  link to Center for Livable Communities link to Energy Information Clearinghouse
  link to Events link to Bookstore link to Services link to Free Publications and Resources
   

 

Newsletters
Articles
Fact Sheets
Reports
Presentations
Guidelines
Model Projects
Local Index of Transit Availability
Participation Toolkits

 

Currents
Case Studies & Fact Sheets
Funding Opportunities
Links

 

Guidebook
Other Resources

    Free Resources | Energy | Case Studies & Fact Sheets | Fact Sheets


A Check List for Local Government Green Power RFPs

Local governments seeking new power providers in a competitive electricity market may be interested in issuing a Request For Proposals (RFP) for "green" power supply options and prices. Since "green" power is a new product offering, both buyers and sellers of green power are still learning how to structure RFPs in order to best satisfy each other's distinct market information needs.

Background:

Companies that compete to gain your business may be offering electricity produced using cheaper or cleaner electricity. Though many local governments have already released RFPs seeking a new power provider, few have focused on how to best structure bidding requirements to facilitate the purchase of clean, renewable energy supplies, also referred to as "green" power. Those that have issued RFPs for green power have not received viable, credible bids, in part, because of the way the RFPs have been designed.

Local governments are learning that purchasing electricity is a difficult process that will likely only result in savings of 1-4 percent off of the total bill [See Local Government Power Supply RFP Status Report Case Study] . Preparing a RFP is very complicated, time intensive, and expensive. When it comes to renewable energy, the process is even more complicated because of the difficulty of accounting for positive environmental benefits associated with renewables but which have not been quantified in most RFPs and the price premiums attached to these cleaner electricity products.

Opportunities:

Local governments interested in promoting a more sustainable electricity system have three choices:

  • Inform: Include information about green power options in the billing envelope for other municipal services.
  • Buy: Purchase green power for your municipal facilities. For example, the Governor's Mansion in Colorado is powered completely by wind power.
  • Aggregate: Aggregate residents to get better electricity rates and to influence the mix of resources and services they receive. Entire cities can "go green" under a municipal aggregation program.

If a local government wants to pursue the buy and/or aggregate options, it will need to develop a RFP. If that is the path you want to take, gather and evaluate critical data relating to your own electricity consumption and collate information about the amounts, patterns and costs of your constituents' electricity consumption. The RFP process consists of these steps: identify energy requirements; develop RFP; distribute to potential suppliers; review/analyze responses; select short list of bidders and negotiate a power purchase deal.

Challenges:

The chief challenge associated with a green RFP is that renewable energy costs more than generic sources of energy. Local governments seeking alternative supplies typically are motivated by cost savings. In order to sell green power to local decision-makers, the case has to be made on the grounds of environmental responsibility, local economic development, or an integrated package of energy services that includes energy efficiency technologies to reduce power demand, thereby lowering bills and offsetting the added expense of green power.

Proposed Solutions:

When San Jose issued a RFP requesting information about renewables, the open-ended nature of the bid frustrated sellers who required more specific benchmarks and/or targets in order to submit a viable and workable bid response. One solution to this problem is to keep it simple when issuing an RFP. In addition, clear direction should be provided to bidders about how you will evaluate the "green" portion of a requested supply portfolio.

Something to keep in mind while developing a RFP is that California currently derives 11 percent of its electricity supply from renewable resources.

Your RFP should at least do no harm and, if possible, improve on the existing mix. Weigh your options. One can base a RFP on a percentage commitment to purchase renewables (e.g., specify 25 percent of our electricity to be green), or on a cost-effectiveness test (e.g., commit to buy as much renewable energy as possible if it doesn't raise the electricity bill from 1997 levels). At a minimum, make certain that any non-renewable power contributes no more air emissions or nuclear waste than the current mix.

Checklist:

Here is a short checklist of issues to consider when designing and evaluating a RFP:

  • Do you have a preference for a certain type of renewable energy?
  • Do you have a preference for the location of the renewable energy supply?
  • Are there particular policy goals, such as economic development, you want to accomplish with your purchase and how can achievement of that goal factor into your bid evaluation?
  • Do you want to incorporate energy efficiency into your green power purchase as part of an integrated clean power energy management program?
  • Are you comfortable with the company offering the electricity?
  • Which proposal has the best price?

For More Information:

Center for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Technologies
Lori Jablonski
1100 11th St. #311, Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 442-7785 • FAX (916) 447-2940
e-mail: lori@cleanpower.org

Lawrence Berkeley Laboratories
Ryan Wiser
1 Cyclotron Rd., MS 90-4000, Berkeley, CA 94720
(510) 486-5474 • FAX (510) 486-6996
e-mail: rhwiser@lbl.gov

Interstate Renewable Energy Council
Jane Weissman
15 Haydn St., Boston, MA 02131-4013
(617) 323-7377 • FAX (617) 325-6738
e-mail: weissmanpv@aol.com

Back to Case Studies/Fact Sheets Index

   

 

Back to Top


Copyright © 2004-2008 Local Government Commission. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy
1303 J St., Ste 250, Sacramento CA, 95814 | 916-448-1198 voice | 916-448-8246 fax