Currents
An Energy Newsletter for Local Governments
The Connection Between Energy Efficiency and Affordable Housing
A home must not impose undue burdens upon its occupants or it's
not affordable. By far, the two largest components of the typical
housing burden are rent and utility bills. Therefore, the role
of utility bills in determining whether or not housing is actually
affordable cannot be underestimated. Inability to pay utility bills
has been noted as the second leading economic cause of homelessness.[1] The recent increase in energy rates in California and the potential
for volatile fluctuations in future energy rates only makes this
a more important issue in California.
Investments in the energy efficiency of housing can help to reduce the costs associated with utility bills but often result in a higher construction cost to the developer. Generally, the developer has few options for recouping his/her investment in energy efficiency. This is especially true for affordable housing developers where rents are constrained. Residential property for rent, when the rent is constrained by public purpose regulations, is the classic example of what is known as "split incentives." The owner is the party required to pay any costs of making the building more energy efficient, and yet none of the direct benefits of those investments flow to the owner. The tenant is the one who will reap most of the benefits of the upgrades, and yet the tenant has no say in the level of investment in energy efficiency.
Local Governments' Role in Promoting Energy Efficiency In Affordable
Housing
Local governments can play a role in promoting energy efficiency
in affordable housing by adopting policy that would encourage owner-developers
to invest in energy efficiency, increase their cash flow, lower
tenant utility costs. After all, lower utility bills help to make
homes more affordable. The average California household spends
about 5% of its monthly income on utilities and the average affordable
housing tenant in California spends about 20%.
By adopting an Energy Efficiency-Based Utility Allowance schedule, housing authorities send a strong message that they support and reward investments in energy efficiency and that it does play a role making homes more affordable. The publicly-funded Designed for Comfort: Efficient Affordable Housing program aims to assist housing authorities in developing, adopting, marketing, and implementing such a policy. It also sets aside a small amount of funding for the rehab of existing affordable projects as case studies to demonstrate the value of the policy. Below is a summary of an Energy Efficiency-Based Utility Allowance schedule and an example of its impact, as well as a description of the benefits provided by the Designed for Comfort: Efficient Affordable Housing program. Finally, a case study of the impacts of an Energy Efficiency-Based Utility Allowance compared to that of The Housing Authority of the County of Riverside's (HACR) Standard Utility Allowance schedule. The case study is based on a typical 53-unit project resulting in a 15-year increase in cash flow of about $181,000.
An Energy Efficiency-Based Utility Allowance Schedule
The
rationale for this schedule is that if an owner-developer builds
new, or rehabs existing, affordable housing so that it is
energy efficient (as defined by the policy), the utility costs
to the tenants would be lower, so the project would then qualify
for a lower utility allowance. This would in turn allow the owner
to collect increased rents without increasing the total housing
burden to the tenant. Further, the model that is used to calculate
the lowered (energy efficiency-based) utility allowance is conservative
and ensures that the tenant saves as well. Below is an example
of a Standard Utility Allowance versus an Energy
Efficiency-Based Utility Allowance and the differing
impact on rent, owner's net income, tenant utility costs, and total
housing burden.
As a public service, the Designed for Comfort: Efficient Affordable Housing program provides full-service assistance to housing authorities statewide to:
HUD Highlights the Energy Efficiency-Based Utility Allowance
as a "Best Practice"
HUD deems adopting the Energy Efficiency-Based
Utility Allowance schedule to be a "best practice" as indicated
in their March-April edition of the online newsletter "Public
Housing Energy Conservation Clearinghouse News." (PDF)
In it, HUD highlights the efforts of Riverside County to adopt and implement an Energy Efficiency-Based Utility Allowance schedule. To download the report "Establishing and Implementing the Energy Efficient Utility Allowance Schedule: Housing Authority of the County of Riverside," register at http://www.designedforcomfort.com/reports.htm.
Why Wouldn't We Adopt an Energy Efficiency-Based Utility Allowance
Schedule?
Although there is no one "silver bullet" incentive offered to
owner-developers of affordable housing to offset the cost of investing
in energy efficiency, however, collectively, increased Tax Credit
funding and utility energy efficiency incentives help to offset
these first costs. The benefit of a housing authority adopting
an Energy Efficiency-Based Utility Allowance schedule has the longest-term
impact of increasing cash flow for the owner-developer. The policy
is straightforward, simple to implement, and benefits both the
owner-developer and the tenant, sends a strong message from the
housing authority that they support energy efficiency as a means
of reducing housing costs and providing a more comfortable home
for tenants. As one housing authority director put it, Why wouldn't
we adopt an Energy Efficiency-Based Utility Allowance schedule?
Ask HMG staff how you can help encourage your local housing authority to adopt this beneficial policy. To take advantage of this service, contact Julieann Summerford at summerford@h-m-g.com, 619-917-5690, or visit www.DesignedforComfort.com.
[1] Karen Brown, Ex Dir, Colorado Energy Assistance Foundation. James Benfield, Ex Dir, Campaign for Home Energy Assistance.