spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
LGC Logo Local Government Commission
Home Page About Local Government Commission Join the LGC
Search Site Map Contact the LGC
  link to Center for Livable Communities link to Energy Information Clearinghouse
  link to Events link to Bookstore link to Services link to Free Publications and Resources
   

 

Newsletters
Articles
Fact Sheets
Reports
Presentations
Guidelines
Model Projects
Local Index of Transit Availability
Participation Toolkits

 

Currents
Case Studies & Fact Sheets
Funding Opportunities
Links

 

Guidebook
Other Resources

    Free Resources | Energy | Currents Newsletter | Mar/Apr 2002


Local Governments Chart A Solar Energy Future

by Peter Asmus

California local government representatives gathered in Sacramento on February 1 for the Local Government Commission’s “Photovoltaic Forum For Local and State Government Leaders” to learn about how they can plug into state initiatives designed to accelerate reliance upon solar and other renewable energy sources. The forum followed up with a two-day implementation meeting on February 25-26.

The forum was also sponsored by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR), a clear sign that Gov. Davis recognizes the critical role local governments must play in pushing new and cleaner power generation technologies.

“The ability of local communities to develop a substantial local power generation program featuring green resources is very, very important to the Governor’s efforts to diversify our power supply portfolio in California,” said Woody Clark, the governor’s senior advisor on energy reliability. “Gov. Davis wants to empower cities and counties to take action at the local level by developing renewable distributed generation facilities throughout the entire state.”

“The key to becoming a sustainable energy state is sustainable communities with diverse energy supplies,” he said. Clark also noted that is why the Governor supports Senator Byron Sher’s SB 532, which would require California to double the amount of renewable energy consumed in California by 2010.

“The concept of sustainability takes many different forms, including the maintenance of secure infrastructure,” Clark said, referring to the strategic benefits renewable distributed generation sources represent as additional security precautions against terrorist attacks.

“Obviously, secure energy supply is a key aspect of the state’s infrastructure. Here at the Governor’s Office, we are learning as much as we can from municipalities such as Santa Monica, Sacramento, San Francisco and Los Angeles when it comes to developing secure power from solar and other renewable energy fuels,” said Clark.

Sacramento Success Story
Forum attendees learned about how the Sacramento Municipal Utility District (SMUD), another forum sponsor, was able to recently surpass the 10 MW milestone on rooftop solar PV installations ® the largest distributed network of solar PV arrays in the world.

Over 1,000 installations of solar PV have taken place in Sacramento since 1993 under a strategy Donald Osborn, SMUD’s superintendent of renewable generation, described as “sustained orderly development.” He noted that costs for solar PV were reduced by 50% due to volume purchase discounts and leveraging of tax-exempt financing. If financed with a 7% interest rate over 30 years, the cost of the electricity from SMUD’s solar PV systems fall in the 8 to 10 cents per kilowatt-hour range, which is just 10-20% above SMUD’s average retail rates. These costs are well below industry averages as well as the retail rates charged by Pacific Gas & Electric and other investor-owned utilities.

“Distributed and renewable generation sources are the future ® and solar is both,” said Osborn. “Solar can shave peak loads, provide grid support and provide a hedge against fossil fuel price shocks. The public relations benefits [of solar] alone justify the cost.” On top of that, solar technologies represent a future profit making business venture for SMUD, he added. Last year, SMUD invested less than 0.5% of its annual revenues on its solar program; demand for the program represented a 10-fold increase beyond expectations, Osborn said.

San Francisco and Vallejo Offer Novel New Approaches
Osborn warned that large-volume purchases backfire if done poorly and can help dry up existing supply, which actually increases end-user costs. The prime lesson, Osborn said, is not to develop too steep a ramping up of PV purchases.

This fundamental lesson from Sacramento is shaping the implementation strategy behind the City and County of San Francisco’s plan to add 50 MW of solar PV authorized by the passage last November of Prop. B, according to Ed Smeloff, Assistant General Manager on Power Policy for the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission.

Described by Osborn as the “godfather” of SMUD’s solar program, Smeloff served on the SMUD board in the ‘80s/early ‘90s, and proposed Sacramento commit to 10 MW of solar PV nine years ago as one of his final acts as a SMUD director.

The 50 MW solar PV purchase for public buildings and land owned by San Francisco would likely be phased-in over 12 years. The bid solicitation will be out this summer.

“The language of Prop. B presents a challenge,” he said. “The cost of solar energy, calculated over the life of the PV system, can be no higher than the power supply it displaces. The SFPUC is developing a screening tool to compare costs. Transmission and distribution cost will be included in the avoided costs associated with traditional centralized power generation facilities.” Including these costs will make it easier for solar projects to be deemed cost effective, Smeloff said, since distributed solar PV avoids these so-called T&D expenses. The SFPUC will also use a quantification of the environmental benefits of solar in its screening tool.

Also passed last November was Prop. H, which allows for the installation of solar PV on the rooftops of private businesses and residents. Prop. U authorizes the issuance of additional revenue bonds above the $100 million already approved by Prop. B. Smeloff noted this additional bond financing will be needed to achieve the goal of reaching the 50 MW solar PV goal for San Francisco.

Larry Asera, a former Solano County Supervisor and currently an energy consultant for the City of Vallejo, described a different approach for local governments: partnering with a private third party who can take advantage of tax credits and other financial benefits that public sector local governments cannot use. In exchange, the local government gains specific expertise it does not have to develop a solar PV or other type of renewable energy system.

Asera pioneered this approach in 1985 when he created a third-party, limited partnership to place a 20 kW solar PV array on the Dixon City Hall rooftop ® the first solar-powered City Hall in the state. Vallejo is working with BP Solar, a major solar PV manufacturer located in nearby Fairfield. Because the City of Vallejo is a chartered city, it was allowed to award a solar source contract to BP Solar.

“A limited liability corporation owned by the City and BP Solar was created to develop a 1 MW solar power plant on a brownfield site,” said Asera.

The project site had to be moved to preserve a red-legged frog habitat. However, a new site has been located and the project is back on track. “Hopefully, we’ll be generating clean solar electricity by the end of this year,” Asera said. Under this arrangement, the limited liability corporation will sell electricity to the City at a price no higher than 10 cents/kWh.

This large solar PV farm received $2.5 million in funding from the California Energy Commission’s (CEC) buy-down rebate program. Though there are no funds left in this account for such large-scale systems, funding is still available through the California Public Utilities Commission’s Self-Generation program.

Funds from both programs can cover up to half of a solar PV system’s initial upfront costs. For more information, contact Don Schultz, CPUC Office of Ratepayer Advocates, at DKS@cpuc.ca.gov.

Next Steps
Many forum participants expressed frustration with the seemingly dizzying array of technical, financial and procedural challenges of moving forward with solar PV and other renewable energy distributed generation technologies.

“When you bring up solar PV and energy efficiency to developers constructing new buildings, they typically say, ‘We can’t do that because that costs too much,’” said Matt Sullivan, a Pleasanton planning commissioner. “Even our own staff does not yet know about how these measures and technologies can pay for themselves. There is a vast void of information about what is currently cost-effective. That information needs to be channeled to city councils and city staffs.” When residents rejected a proposal for a 50 MW natural gas peaking power plant, the City Council set up an energy committee to draft a sustainable energy policy for the community. That plan, featuring a green building ordinance and renewable energy and energy efficiency elements, is slated for adoption before summer.

“The notion of distributed generation is not new,” said Tracy Saville, Assistant Director of Conservation and Distributed Generation for the California Power Authority. “What is new is the notion that the CPA, on behalf of the State of California and in partnership with local governments, is coordinating policies, leadership efforts, and financing/ project deployment resources toward a ‘clean energy’ policy for California.”

“Local governments are one of the keys to education and outreach to their citizens to promote solar PV and distributed generation, to addressing local permitting and interconnections challenges, and to creating local-level ‘green community’ policies,” Saville said.

Funding for the forums came from the Energy Foundation, the Energy Commission’s Renewable Energy Consumer Education program and SMUD.

| Back | Next |

   

 

Back to Top


Copyright © 2004-2008 Local Government Commission. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy
1303 J St., Ste 250, Sacramento CA, 95814 | 916-448-1198 voice | 916-448-8246 fax