spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
LGC Logo Local Government Commission
Home Page About Local Government Commission Join the LGC
Search Site Map Contact the LGC
  link to Center for Livable Communities link to Energy Information Clearinghouse
  link to Events link to Bookstore link to Services link to Free Publications and Resources
   

 

Newsletters
Articles
Fact Sheets
Reports
Presentations
Guidelines
Model Projects
Local Index of Transit Availability
Participation Toolkits

 

Currents
Case Studies & Fact Sheets
Funding Opportunities
Links

 

Guidebook
Other Resources

     Free Resources | Land Use | SJV Livable Places News | Fall 2000


Fall 2000


Making Valley Streets Safer for Walking

In the summer issue of Livable Places News, we documented the financial dividends that occur when we build neighborhoods and downtowns where people find it easy and appealing to walk. However, there is another important consideration – perhaps more important than the economic one. It is the health and safety of the pedestrian.

Cars kill more people than strangers with guns (at a ratio of 1.6 to 1) according to 1997 research. And for every pedestrian that is killed by an automobile, 20 more are injured – a total of 110,000 across the United States every year. Young children are particularly vulnerable. Being hit by a car while walking is the second leading cause of death for California children. Statewide, nearly 5,000 young pedestrians are injured every year.

Anyone who has suffered the humiliation of traffic school has learned that the higher your speed, the worse the accident. The probability of a pedestrian being killed is 3.5% when a vehicle is traveling at 15 miles per hour, but increases more than tenfold to 37% at 31 mph and 83% at 44 mph.

Because travel speeds are correlated with street widths, making roads wider – and easier for drivers to go fast – can create a health hazard. A recent study in Longmont, Colorado, revealed that the safest street was 24 feet wide. The most dangerous street, statistically, was the 36-foot wide street typically found in new subdivisions. The majority of pedestrian deaths occur on such neighborhood streets.

Local governments have a unique opportunity to make streets safer by encouraging narrow streets in developing subdivisions and carrying out traffic calming “retrofits” to slow traffic on existing streets.

Making New Streets More Narrow
bulboutSeveral Valley communities have adopted standards for narrow streets in new development. The cities of Escalon and Turlock both allow “skinny streets.” The Fresno Growth Alternatives Alliance, a joint effort of the business community, farm interests, and building industry, advocates for narrow streets in its landmark document, Landscape of Choice. The LGC is currently working with the Alliance on developing model smart growth codes for Fresno County. Information about this effort is available by calling Steve Hoyt at the LGC, (916) 448-1198.

Calming Existing Streets
“Traffic calming” refers to techniques and devices used to slow traffic.

One of the most effective traffic calming devices is the traffic circle. The installation of traffic circles, also known as roundabouts, has reduced accidents by 94% in Seattle and 50% in Portland, Oregon.

Narrowing the road through extending curbing at street crossings is also a very effective traffic calming strategy. Not only does this make streets more attractive, it has reduced accidents in Vancouver, British Columbia by 75%.

A number of San Joaquin Valley communities have used curb extensions to increase the walkability of their downtowns, among them are Visalia, Taft, Hanford, Lindsay and Bakersfield.

Opposition to Narrower Streets?
In general, there is citizen support for both narrow streets and for traffic calming. Multiple community image surveys carried out in San Joaquin Valley communities have revealed that participants consistently give low marks to images of wide streets and high marks to narrow, tree-shaded ones.

However, in spite of their public support, city and county fire officials often oppose narrow streets because they feel such streets slow the ability of a fire truck to quickly respond to an emergency. The unfortunate result is that streets are more-often-than-not built too wide, compromising the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists.

In some communities, traffic calming projects have proceeded over the objections of the fire department. However, when fire officials are left out of the planning process, measures which could accommodate the needs of both the pedestrian and the fire truck are never even brought to light.

Increasingly, fire departments and residents are learning how to work together. Portland, for instance, has had considerable success in creating win/win solutions for the interests of both. Narrow Streets and the Fire Department, a new video now available from the Local Government Commission, features interviews with fire chiefs in communities where cooperation is occurring, to everyone’s benefit.

The LGC also has several guidebooks available: The Citizens’ Guide to Traffic Calming — a useful tool in helping citizens choose traffic calming options — and Street Design Guidelines for Healthy Neighborhoods — a guide providing actual dimensions for pedestrian-friendly streets. To order, call Karen Cole, LGC, (916)448-1198. Also helpful is Dangerous by Design: Pedestrian Safety in California, by the Surface Transportation Policy Project, available at http://www.transact.org.

Back to Main Page

Back to the top

Next Page

   

 

Back to Top


Copyright © 2004-2008 Local Government Commission. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy
1303 J St., Ste 250, Sacramento CA, 95814 | 916-448-1198 voice | 916-448-8246 fax