The United States is experiencing a paradigm shift in neighborhood design. Individuals and groups are developing innovative strategies by which to make new or existing neighborhoods more walkable, enjoyable and livable. After years of neglect, street design is regaining its status as a vital element of neighborhood and town planning.
The reasons for this status are self-evident: people want to live on streets where there are low traffic volumes, slow speeds and minimal noise. Residents also seek proximity to parks, schools and other facilities for their children, while many baby boomers’ changing mobility means new desire for sidewalks, trails, greenways and open space. However, the streets and neighborhoods built since the 1950s have often created the opposite conditions: wide streets full of fast, noisy traffic and subdivisions that encourage automobile dependence. The walk to the corner store for a pound of bread has, for many, been replaced with a drive in a 2 ton vehicle. Even when stores lie close to homes, land uses are separated to such an extent that it’s often impossible to reach them without a motor vehicle.
This separation of uses is common in modern zoning codes. The typical layout of a conventional community (as shown on the right side of the diagram below) locates residential, commercial and civic buildings in distinct enclaves that are often connected only through larger arterial roadways As a result, the child living in the residential subdivision to the bottom right of the diagram cannot visit the local park unless she is driven there. The same is true of most other trips an individual or family wants to make. Therefore, most trips require use of a car, thereby exacerbating already congested arterial roadways.
In contrast, the traditional neighborhood seen on the left side of the diagram places houses, schools, shops and offices in close proximity to each other. Its street design provides a fully connected travel network with multiple routes to destinations. A child can comfortably walk or ride a bike to the park without confronting any 8- or 10-lane arterial roadways .
The contrast between these two models extends even further. Because streets in the conventional neighborhood are longer and serve more people than those in the traditional neighborhood, they tend to be wider and thus to allow higher traffic speeds. The emphasis on motor vehicle capacity has encouraged traffic engineers to design streets with minimal obstacles for errant drivers, so trees are often set at a distance from the roadway and on-street parking is discouraged. The resulting wide streets and long blocks, then, literally encourage speeding and discourage walking and biking. A 1998 study of 20,000 accidents over a 20-year period by Swift & Associates of Longmont, Colorado found a direct correlation between street width and accident rates. The safest streets were roughly 24 feet wide. As streets gained width the number of accidents (per mile, per year) increased. Therefore, higher traffic speeds that often result from wider streets may account for this rise in traffic accidents.
The traditional neighborhood street, however, is narrow and lined with trees that not only help calm traffic but also increase comfort for walkers and cyclists. Many residents and local officials are recognizing that these traditional streets help form more livable neighborhoods. As a result, efforts are underway to design or retrofit more streets to mirror these characteristics, including such measures as ‘traffic calming.’ The latter denotes a set of mostly physical treatments to roadways that help manage traffic flow and encourage safer, more civil driver behavior within districts and neighborhoods. Traffic speed, noise and volume are often reduced, and traffic distribution rebalanced, via such measures. The LGC has published a detailed guide to traffic calming that explains the technical and collaborative processes required for its implementation.
Meanwhile, the New Urbanist movement, advocating neotraditional neighborhood design that incorporates features of older, mixed-use, traditional communities, continues to grow. The LGC’s Street Design Guidelines for Healthy Neighborhoods discusses in detail many of the design principles and techniques involved in this type of planning.
The Local Government Commission has developed several guidebooks that discuss how to design or retrofit streets and neighborhoods to make them more supportive of walking and bicycling.
- It’s A Safe Decision: Complete Streets in California was produced by the National Complete Streets Coalition and Local Government Commission with a grant from the California Endowment.
- Street Design Guidelines for Healthy Neighborhoods was written by Dan Burden, director of Walkable Communities, with assistance from a team that included two traffic engineers, an urban designer and a citizen planner. It discusses how to build low-volume, slow speed traditional residential streets.
- Streets and Sidewalks, People and Cars: A Citizens’ Guide to Traffic Calming, by Dan Burden, provides detailed information for local government officials and residents on how to retrofit streets to slow the traffic.
- Emergency Response, Traffic Calming and Traditional Neighborhood Streets, by Dan Burden with Paul Zykofsky, is designed to address concerns raised by fire departments and other emergency responders to innovative street retrofit and design efforts. It also helps explain to traffic engineers, local officials and residents what the emergency responders’ concerns are all about.
Our series of 4-page illustrated fact sheets with a Focus on Livable Communities provide a brief, easy-to-read overview on the following key topics related to walkable communities:
- The Economic Benefits of Walkable Communities
- Why People Don’t Walk and What City Planners Can Do About It
- Land Use Planning for Safe, Crime-Free Neighborhoods
- Designing Safe Streets and Neighborhoods
- New Transportation Thinking for a New Transportation Age
- US DOT Supports Walking and Bicycling
Single copies of these fact sheets are available free from the LGC and can also be downloaded in PDF format from our web page. Bulk copies for wider distribution are also available at a nominal fee.
An additional fact sheet, The “Transportation Tools to Improve Children’s Health and Mobility”, highlights engineering solutions for more walkable communities.
- Narrow Streets Database (www.sonic.net/abcaia/narrow.htm)
- Federal Highway Administration, Context-Sensitive Design (www.fhwa.dot.gov/context/index.cfm)
- Federal Highway Administration, Traffic Calming (www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/tcalm)
- Institute of Transportation Engineers (www.ite.org)
- Municipal Research and Service Center, Traffic Calming (www.mrsc.org/subjects/transpo/traffic/calming.aspx)
- Traffic Reduction / Street Reclaiming Made Easy (www.lesstraffic.com)
- Conservation Law Foundation, Public Transportation Advocacy (www.clf.org/programs/projects.asp?id=1011)
- Victoria Transportation Policy Institute (www.vtpi.org)
- Walkable Communities, Inc. (www.walkable.org)
- Model Design Manual for Living Streets (www.modelstreetdesignmanual.com/)